Scientists originally thought that DNA was too basic a molecule to be able to carry hereditary information.

You are watching: Why did researchers originally think that protein was the genetic material

For the an initial half of the 20th century, scientists ongoing to believe that the proteins in chromosomes developed the communication of the hereditary information that was passed indigenous generation come generation. To them, DNA was too straightforward a molecule to have the ability to carry that sort of facility information and also proteins verified much much more variation.

However, a series of experiments performed by various groups of researchers started to reveal that in fact it was DNA, no protein, the carries the hereditary information.

Avery-Macleod-McCarty experiment

In 1944, Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod and Maclyn McCarty helped show the function of DNA as the carrier of hereditary information through working through the bacter that causes pneumonia, Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Frederick Griffith determined the ‘transforming principle’.

However, their work-related was given a head begin by a brother bacteriologist referred to as Frederick Griffith, who identified something dubbed the ‘transforming principle’.

Frederick studied two strains of the Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. One, called the S strain, had actually smooth walls and also was fatal when injected right into mice. The 2nd strain, R, had rough walls and was not fatal when injected into mice. The S strain to be smooth due to a coat made out of sugars that helped safeguard it from the computer mouse immune system. The stormy R bacteria to be rough because it walk not have actually a sugar coat, and so was not safeguarded from the computer mouse immune system.

Frederick brought out a collection of experiments to investigate the strains further.

first he killed S bacteria v heat and injected them into the mice. The mice survived. He then injected heat-killed S bacteria together with living R bacteria. The mice died. After researching the blood that these mouse he was surprised to discover living S bacteria in it, in which method the stormy R bacteria had transformed right into smooth S bacteria. He then involved the conclusion that there was a ‘transforming principle’ responsible for this.

But what precisely was it? was it the protein in the bacteria, the sugar coat on the S bacteria, the immune device of the mouse or the nucleic acids RNA and also DNA?

Enter Oswald Avery and his colleagues. Working in check tubes, they provided detergent come break open up the heat-killed S cells to different out the different components:


They then destroyed the materials one by one come identifywhich component was the ‘transforming principle’.The team published their outcomes in 1944.

next they included protein-digesting enzyme to destroy every one of the protein in the bacteria, and yet again when blended with R bacteria, the R transformed right into S. For this reason the ‘transforming principle’ clearly wasn’t a protein either. Next they diverted the main point acids, DNA and RNA, using alcohol.They then destroyed the RNA utilizing the RNase enzyme, leaving just the DNA behind. They combined it with the R bacteria, and change from R come S quiet occurred. So, it no RNA. Finally, they ruined the DNA in the systems using DNase, combined it with the R bacteria, and also no change occurred, the R bacteria stayed rough. So, the ‘transforming principle’ must be DNA!

Image credit: Genome study Limited

The Hershey-Chase experiments

TheT2 virusinfects the bacterium Escherichia coli. The only method it have the right to replicate is by infecting a cell.

In 1952, experiments by Alfred Hershey and also Martha Chase further supported the findings from the occupational of Avery, Macleod and also McCarty. Hershey and also Chase offered a viruscalled T2 to investigate if the hereditary information to be passed ~ above via DNA or proteins. Return T2 is comprised of just a piece ofDNAand a scrap ofprotein, the virus can hijack bacterialcellsto make an ext copies of itself. Researchers knew that the instructions for making brand-new viruses must as such have been lugged in the DNA or protein, yet they didn"t know which.

When Hershey and Chase added aradioactivelabel come theDNAof the originalT2 virus, they uncovered that the viruses produced were likewise radioactive. However, when they repeated the experiment labelling the protein fairly than the DNA that the original virus, they discovered that the viruses developed were not radioactive.

Hershey and Chase concluded the DNAcarried the instructions to make newviruses, which was passed top top to succeeding generations.


Image credit: Genome research Limited

Chargaff and his ‘rules’

Erwin Chargaff aided pave the method to understanding the three-dimensional structure of the DNA molecule.

The results of experiments by an Austrian scientist Erwin Chargaff assisted pave the means to expertise the three-dimensional framework of the DNA molecule.

See more: How Many Hours A Day Do Cows Sleep Standing? Cows Need Their Beauty Sleep

Erwin set out to investigate if there were any crucial differences between the DNA of various species. Complying with this he came to two conclusions, which came to be known together ‘Chargaff’s rules’:

In DNA, regardless of which organism it comes from, the amount of adenine (A)is normally the exact same as the amount of thymine (T), and the lot of guanine (G) is normally the very same as the lot of cytosine (C). The ingredient of DNA varies in between different types such the the lot of each base is different. This diversity in the ingredient of DNA made it a much more credible candidate for the hereditary material 보다 protein.

Erwin Chargaff’s rules were a an important step in understanding the framework of DNA. In 1952, he met v James Watson and Francis Crick in Cambridge and discussed his findings through them. Although no the many cordial that encounters, Chargaff’s rules did assist James and also Francisto describe the three-dimensional structure of the DNA.